Rosenbloom v. Grossman
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
This is a suit in equity to ascertain and determine title to real estate, under Section 527.150 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., and for a judgment, in accordance with Section 527.-020 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., declaring that plaintiffs’ Lot 19, Block 22 of University Park in University City, is not bound by a certain recorded instrument in writing purporting to create an easement. Defendants’ answer claimed an easement over plaintiffs’ lot by the terms of that instrument, and also by prescription, and by necessity. The Circuit Court, declining to pass upon the effect of the written…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jacobs v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Anderson v. AbernathySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- St. Louis Safe Deposit & Savings Bank v. Kennett EstateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Wells v. North East Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Henry Vogt Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Allen v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Blackburn v. Habitat Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Snyder v. Monroe Township TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Meade v. GinnKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Bladdick v. Ozark Ore Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.