Largan Precision Co. v. Genius Electronic Optical Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE INFRINGEMENT
JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Largan and defendant Genius have filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of direct, contributory, and induced infringement. See Dkt. Nos. 214, 2151 The motions overlap substantially and focus on the issue of whether Genius’s conduct was sufficiently connected to the United States to give rise to infringement liability. The Court finds that, although Genius’s products meet the elements of Largan’s patents as alleged, all but a sliver of the accused conduct took place…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duvall Espresso IP Enforcement, LLC v. Meticulous Home, Inc. and Juan Carlos Lopez PendasDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Echosens SA v. E-Scopics S.A.S.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- TD Professional Services v. Truyo IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Viavi Solutions Inc. v. Platinum Optics Technology Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023