Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bowen v. United States Postal Service

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 1983No. 81-525Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Justice White, with whom Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice Rehnquist (except as to Part IV) join,

concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.

The Court holds that an employer who wrongfully discharges an employee protected by a collective-bargaining agreement with an arbitration clause is only responsible for backpay that accrues prior to the hypothetical date upon which an arbitrator would have issued an award had the employee’s union taken the matter to arbitration. All backpay damages that accrue after this time are the sole responsibil*231ity of the union, even…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API