Legal Opinion

Soonthai Douangdala v. Pamela Bondi et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 26, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00963Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 SOONTHAI DOUANGDALA, CASE NO. 2:26-cv-00963-DGE 11 Petitioner, ORDER ON MOTION FOR 12 v. ATTORNEY FEES (DKT. NO. 24) 13 PAMELA BONDI et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to 17 Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Dkt. No. 24.) Respondents filed an opposition. 18 (Dkt. No. 25.) As discussed in more detail below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED in part and 19 DENIED in part. Furthermore, the fee award is STAYED pending…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API