Legal Opinion
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kleyman
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 7, 2021No. 0:21-cv-01943Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA U.S. Securities and Exchange Case No. 21-cv-1943 (WMW/KMM) Commission, Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING CONSENT JUDGMENT v. Howard S. Kleyman, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) motion for entry of the parties’ proposed consent judgment (Proposed Consent Judgment). (Dkt. 2.) The Proposed Consent Judgment represents a purported agreement between the parties to resolve a dispute regarding allegations that Defendant Howard S. Kleyman violated federal securities laws. For the reasons…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Telluride Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Appellee, v. Robert L. RIDENOUR, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Product Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.