Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ronald Allen Smith v. Jack McCormick Warden, Montana State Prison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1990No. 88-4115Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFernandez, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the portion of the court’s opinion set forth in Parts II, III and IV, although I concur in Parts V and VI.

Before turning to the merits of the claims, a few words should be said about the facts of the case.

As the majority notes, Smith, for no good reason whatever, killed two Native American men, who had befriended him and his companions. A part of the reason for these senseless killings was the theft of the victims’ vehicle. More importantly, as Smith admitted at his first sentencing hearing, he killed them because he wanted to see what it would be like to kill…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Dugger v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API