Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mateo v. Rubiales

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1998No. 97-2922Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGunther, J.

I agree that a reversal is in order. As the majority states, where the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees have been met, the trial court may deny an award of reasonable fees only upon a finding of bad faith on the part of the demanding party.

I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s direction regarding what should take place below upon remand. I think that the trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the August 1996 demands for judgment were made in bad faith. See Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 641 So.2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API