Whitehall Cement Manufacturing Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GRIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff in this tax refund case asks the court to grant a reargument on one of the issues resolved against it in the court’s opinion filed January 25, 1965.
In that opinion, 237 F.Supp. 838, it was decided that in computing taxpayer’s depletion allowance for the mining of cement rock, an allocation had to be made between those costs and profits properly attributable to the mining of cement rock and those properly attributable to the manufacturing of Portland cement, the end product marketed by taxpayer. It was determined that in making this allocation the costs of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Standard Lime and Cement Company (Formerly Known as the Standard Lime and Stone Company) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Whitehall Cement Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- The Whitehall Cement Manufacturing Company, in No. 15603 v. United States of America, in No. 15604Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969