Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker Life Ins. v. Heidel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Davidson County. N. Baxter, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Coóper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On May 7, 1866, William Heidel tools from the Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company a participating policy on his life for $5000, payable upon his death to Rosalie Heidel, his wife, at an annual premium of $153,20, one-half in cash, and the other half by note. The premium was paid and secured as required each year up to May 7, 1875, included. On May 3, 1876, Heidel, in the name of himself and wife, wrote to the company that he wished to cancel the policy, and requested the company to notify him, if he desired a return of premium under a clause in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Ruse v. . the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Cohen v. . N.Y. Mutual Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Farmers' Insurance & Loan Co. v. SnyderCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  5. North America Life Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garner v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. Garner v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API