Mills Development Corp. v. Shipp & Head, Inc.

—The facts in this case are not stated here because they are fully set out in Mills, et al., v. Shipp & Head, Inc., 126 Fla. 490, 171 So. 535, and second appeal, same title, 126 Fla. 495, 171 So. 535.

The second appeal was special and limited to an interlocutory decree denying Appellant’s motion to quash the service by publication on defendants and to vacate said order of publication. We affirmed the decree below and held the service by publication sufficient.

The first appeal was from a decree denying a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint. We held that the bill con tained equity and that…