Legal Opinion
Soderman v. Stone Bar Associates Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDiGiovanna, J.
In this action it was stipulated between all counsel that the issues of fact and law arising upon the cross pleadings be submitted to the court for decision and judgment. After a lengthy trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff against Stone Bar Associates Inc., the general contractor, and McHarma Construction Co. Inc., a subcontractor. Now the court is required to decide the issues of law and fact arising upon the cross pleadings.
Plaintiff was an ironworker in the employ of Atlas Erection Co. Inc., a subcontractor of the general contractor, in connection with construction of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People ex rel. Glasier v. GlasierNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Empire City Iron Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Martin v. Siegfried Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Peskin v. Port of New York AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Farrell v. General Telephone Co. of Upstate New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.