Legal Opinion

Warder-Bushnell & Glessner Co. v. Minnesota & Dakota Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 20, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Rea, J., (a jury being waived,) and judgment of $112.50 ordered for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

On the trial of this action there was no controversy over the facts. January-23, 1888, one Barsaloux, being indebted to the plaintiff corporation, executed and delivered to it his promissory note, due November 1st of the same year, for the sum of $121.40-, securing it by a mortgage on certain personal property, including all -wheat, oats, and” barley which might be raised by him that year upon a duly-described tract of land which he then occupied as a farm, near the village of Argyle in this state. On the 26th of December, 1888, no part of this note had been paid. Of the crop of wheat raised…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nash v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Kelly v. SeelySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  3. Smith v. RobertsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Endreson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. O'Brien v. FindeisenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API