Legal Opinion

Fallon v. Esher

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County

Decided July 11, 1949No. 157Published

1Opinion of the Court

Troutman, J.,

— On March 1, 1949, plaintiffs, John J. Fallon and Frank J. Rosini, trading and doing business as F. & R. General Excavators, instituted an action in assumpsit against Harold Esher and Dorothy Esher, defendants. Defendants filed preliminary objections to plaintiffs’ complaint, one in the form of a motion for a more specific complaint and the other in the nature of a demurrer.

In support of their preliminary objection in the nature of a motion for a more specific complaint, de*226fendants assigned seven reasons for such objection. The first reason is that the complaint fails to set…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northampton Brewery Corp. v. LandeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Home Protection Building & Loan Ass'n CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. DuBois Lumber & Coal Co. v. StrouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API