Legal Opinion

Bickett v. Bickett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 1991No. 90-332Published

1Per curiam

The final judgment is affirmed under authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). This ruling is without prejudice for either party to apply to the trial court for relief from a continuing writ of garnishment obtained by the former wife’s former counsel,1 directed at the income of the husband, in an effort to collect former counsel’s judgment for attorney’s fees. The parties have asserted that counsel has garnished funds which were the source for the husband’s payment of child support and alimony, resulting in those obligations not being paid. If that is the case (and there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Garcia v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, PA v. ErnstDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API