Legal Opinion

City of Camden v. Public Service Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Oil error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 53 Vroom 246.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The Supreme Court made absolute a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not be issued. We have before us only the rule, the agreed facts and the order making the rule absolute. There is no judgment and not even a writ of mandamus. An attempt is made in the assignments of error to raise a constitutional question, but this is not argued. If it were, it could not be considered where there is no final judgment. The statute applies only to cases where the mandamus is denied or the rule discharged. Comp. Stat., p. 3216, § 6.

The more general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. School District v. MannionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  2. Mayor of Paterson v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Switz v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API