Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Settle

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court of tbe second judical district, Alturas county.

1Opinion of the Court

Hollister, J.,

delivered tbe opinion.

Whitson, J., concurred. Noggle, O. J., dissented.

Tbis is an action brought by tbe plaintiff in error against tbe defendant in error to recover tbe possession of a certain mining claim situated in Alturas county, wbicb it is alleged tbe defendant unlawfully withheld. Tbe judgment in tbe court below was for tbe defendant, to reverse wbicb tbe plaintiff sued out bis writ of error. Tbe plaintiff assigns tbe following errors, viz.:

*4861. The court erred in sustaining the objection of respondent’s counsel to the question propounded to the witness, John Gray.

2. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noyes v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
  2. Depuy v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benz v. D.L. Evans BankIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dunlap v. PattisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Godfrey v. FaustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Bolinger v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Fee v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API