Legal Opinion
George D. Van Curen v. A. R. Jago and William J. Brown
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1981No. 80-3351PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
In deciding this appeal we determine what due process requirements must be met before a state parole authority may rescind its action granting parole to an inmate effective at a future date. The district court held that the petitioner, an inmate of an Ohio correctional facility, “had no constitutionally protectable expectation in early release, even under the unusual circumstances presented by this case.” We reverse for the reasons hereafter set forth.
The facts are not in dispute. Van Curen was sentenced to not less than six nor more than 100 years incarceration on a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Victory v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Jago v. Van CurenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Inmates of Orient Correctional Institute v. Ohio State Adult Parole AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Ricky Allen v. William Seabold, Warden Wayne Dunn Caroline Angel Murphy Lt. Thomas Pryor Richard Pershing Bobby Waller Jack Woods John C. RundaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- George D. Van Curen v. A. R. Jago and William J. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.