Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Wallace

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1960No. A-7615Published

1Opinion of the Court

338 S.W.2d 153 (1960)

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO et al., Petitioners,

v.

Curtis WALLACE et al., Respondents.

No. A-7615.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 13, 1960.

Carlos C. Cadena, City Atty., San Antonio, for petitioners.

Adrian Spears, San Antonio, for respondents.

NORVELL, Justice.

The petitioner's motion for rehearing in this cause was duly considered after submission and oral argument in the connected causes of City of San Antonio v. Kneupper, Tex.Sup., 338 S.W.2d 121, City of San Antonio v. Whitten, Tex.Sup., 338 S. W.2d 119, and City of San Antonio v. Carr, Tex.Sup., 338 S.W.2d 122. Such motion is…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. City of San Antonio v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API