Legal Opinion
AMBASE CORP. v. COMMISSIONER
United States Tax Court
Decided May 23, 2001No. 11816-95UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMBASE CORPORATION, F.K.A. THE HOME GROUP INC., INDIVIDUALLY, AND AMBASE CORPORATION, F.K.A. THE HOME GROUP INC., AS DESIGNATED AGENT OF CITY INVESTING COMPANY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
AMBASE CORP. v. COMMISSIONER
No. 11816-95
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2001-122; 2001 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 150; 81 T.C.M. (CCH) 1657;
May 23, 2001, Filed
Decision will be entered for petitioner.
M. Carr Ferguson, Jr., John A. Corry, Laura M. Barzilai, and Marina A. Choundas, for petitioner.
Elsie Hall and Dante D. Lucas, for respondent.
Gale, Joseph H.
GALE
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lucas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Plantation Patterns, Incorporated v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, John S. Jemison, Jr. And Marie S. Jemison v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Northern Indiana Public Service Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Bass v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- AmBase Corp. v. City Investing Co. Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Ambase Corporation v. City Investing Company Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003