Legal Opinion
Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
Grand Ronde Tribal Court
Decided January 27, 2003No. C-02-10-007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*148ORDER GRANTING TRIBAL COUNCIL’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND FOR VEXATIOUS LITIGANT ORDER
KATHARINE ENGLISH, Chief Judge.
A. BACKGROUND; INTRODUCTION
As noted in the Court’s earlier Order Denying Petitioner Pearsall’s Motion for Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order, in this proceeding he has filed a complaint against the Tribal Council, the Tribe, and three individuals, all of whom are members of the Tribal Council, as is Petitioner himself. In his first amended complaint, Petitioner generally alleges that the Tribal Council has acted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde CommunityGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2004