Legal Opinion

Smith v. State, Ex Rel. Duty, Prosecuting Atty

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 10, 1947No. 4-8141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This action was instituted June 21, 1946, in the name of the State, in the Benton Circuit Court, by the prosecuting attorney of that district, against J. Frank Smith and Eli Leflar, challenging the right of each of these parties to serve as judge of the municipal court of the city of Rogers. The action is brought under what is known as the Usurpation Statute, §§ 14325-14332, Pope’s Digest.

The petition, and amendment thereto, alleged that Eogers is a city of the first class and by ordinance May 5, 1946, established a municipal court in said city under the authority of 9897-9912, inclusive, of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sheboygan Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Whittaker v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  3. Hogins v. BullockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Payne v. RittmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  5. State v. SamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beshear v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Logan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Logan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2000
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API