Legal Opinion
Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water District
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 2004No. 04-1089PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
pDECUIR, Judge.
Claimant appeals a determination by the workers’ compensation judge that his claim for indemnity benefits had prescribed.
FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Fontenot was injured while working as a meter reader for Reddell Vidrine Water District on October 7, 1997. Fontenot filed a claim for benefits in 1999, and judgment was entered on January 25, 2000, awarding him weekly compensation benefits at the rate of $244.73 per week and penalties and attorney fees. In a previous appeal, those penalties and attorney fees were reduced by a panel of this court. Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Dufrene v. VIDEO CO-OP, LA. WORKERS'COMP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donald Lee Francis v. Home Furniture CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Francis v. Home Furniture Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016