Merryman v. State

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant again urges upon us the insufficiency of the information, notwithstanding the fact that no attack was made thereon during the trial of the case.

We perceive no fundamental defect in the information. To the contrary, it follows established precedents. Young v. State, 47 S. W. 2d 320; Clifton v. State, 135 S. W. 2d 115.

If consideration be given to appellant’s complaint of argument of state’s counsel, no reversible error is reflected thereby, because the argument violated no statutory or mandatory right. When viewed in connection with…