Legal Opinion
Claim of Stokes v. Valeo Electrical Systems, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 28, 2006, which ruled, among other things, that claimant’s case had not been closed in February 2000.
On August 23, 1999, claimant filed a workers’ compensation claim for a strain to her wrists, forearms, elbows and shoulders caused by the repetitive-motion nature of her employment as an assembly worker for her employer, Valeo Electrical Systems, Inc., whose workers’ compensation carrier is the State Insurance Fund (hereinafter collectively referred to as Valeo). After an independent medical exam (hereinafter IME) ordered by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Claim of Somers v. DemcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In the Matter of Somers v. DemcoNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Claim of Hirschhorn v. L & N Fruit & Produce, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Claim of McGarry v. Capatano & Grow Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Claim of Lane v. Tompkins County Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Hammond v. Dutchess Building SpecialistsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Claim of Copak v. Our Lady of VictoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Claim of Rodriguez v. Metal Cladding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Rodriguez v. Metal Cladding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013