Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1928No. Gen. No. 32,497PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Cook county, entered October 8, 1926, wherein the court after a hearing, dismissed complainants’ original bill (filed January 27, 1926) and supplemental bill (filed January 30, 1926) for want of equity. Complainants sought to enjoin the enforcement of certain rules, adopted by the board of education on December 9, 1925, and/known as the “Emeritus” rules, wherein it was provided inter alia that “hereafter no member of the teaching force shall be continued in class room or supervisory duties who shall be more than seventy years of age.” At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Fursman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Armstrong v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. McCoy v. McCaheyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API