Legal Opinion

Damiano v. Finney

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1970No. 10353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This action arises from a contract wherein the Finneys agreed to sell and the Damianos agreed to buy a lake front lodge property. Included in the contract was a provision granting a right of first refusal to purchase an additional parcel of land and also a fixed price option to purchase the same parcel of land under certain conditions. At a later time the Damianos sought to exercise the option to purchase the additional parcel and the Finneys refused on the basis that the conditions had not been complied with. The Damianos brought this action for specific performance which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of SulphurCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Shull v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Wellington, Sears & Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steel Farms, Inc. v. Croft & Reed, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Isaacson v. First Security Bank of UtahIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Commissioner of Revenue v. MolesworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Isaacson v. First Security Bank of UtahIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Zubillaga v. BransfordDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API