Legal Opinion

Edward M. Stuart and the John E. Stuart Company v. Theodore C. Meeker, Doing Business as Tri-State Engineering & Service Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 7, 1961No. 16060PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The parties had been partners in an air conditioning business. Stuart sold his interest to Meeker and agreed that for two years he would not “interfere” with Meeker’s business, but would work for him as a part-time employee. Meeker sued Stuart for alleged violations of the dissolution agreement and was awarded damages and other relief. Stuart appeals.

We accept the trial court’s interpretation of the dissolution agreement, and are of the opinion that the evidence supported its decision.

Affirmed.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Seaboard Finance Company, Seaboard Finance Company, Cross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. American Bible Society v. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. C-E-I-R, Inc. v. Computer Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Hayes v. AltmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. John A. Metheany v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API