Ex Parte Baker
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.
The issue in this case is whether the post-conviction writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is available for complaints that counsel performed inadequately on a motion for forensic DNA testing under Chapter 64 of the Code. We hold that it is not.
The Applicant
In 1995 a jury found Mitchell Austin Baker guilty of the felony offenses of aggravated sexual assault and compelling prostitution. He was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The judgments of conviction were affirmed on appeal in 1998. 1
The Motion for Forensic DNA Testing
In 2001, Chapter 64 of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte TuleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
3Cited by76 opinions
- Daniel, Ex Parte Jefferie AnteriesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Ex Parte SuhreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Hooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- In Re Birdwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- Gaither, Ex Parte Michael WayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.