Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Baker

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 2006No. AP-75,196PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.

The issue in this case is whether the post-conviction writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is available for complaints that counsel performed inadequately on a motion for forensic DNA testing under Chapter 64 of the Code. We hold that it is not.

The Applicant

In 1995 a jury found Mitchell Austin Baker guilty of the felony offenses of aggravated sexual assault and compelling prostitution. He was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. The judgments of conviction were affirmed on appeal in 1998. 1

The Motion for Forensic DNA Testing

In 2001, Chapter 64 of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte TuleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Daniel, Ex Parte Jefferie AnteriesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Ex Parte SuhreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Hooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  4. In Re Birdwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  5. Gaither, Ex Parte Michael WayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API