Chavers v. National Security Fire & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
Bill and Diana Chavers appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in favor of National Security Fire and Casualty Company. The trial court found the Chaverses’ claim of bad faith refusal to pay was barred by the doctrine of res judicata and “other applicable laws of the State of Alabama.” We reverse.
The facts of this case were adequately set out by this court in Chavers v. National Security Fire and Casualty Co., 405 So.2d 1 (Ala.1981). On remand, after further discovery, the trial court entered summary judgment on 14 June 1983. The Chaverses appeal.
National Security contends the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. SimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Sexton v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Dumas v. Southern Guaranty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Hester v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- Higgins v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Chandler v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Federal Ins. Co. v. TRAVEL CAS. AND SUR.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Evans v. Mutual Assur., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Blake v. American Family Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.