Legal Opinion
Laudano v. General Motors Corporation
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided September 2, 1977No. FILE No. 367PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnthony J. Armentano, J.
The trial court found the following facts: The third-party plaintiff, General Motors Corporation (hereinafter referred to as GMC), was in control of premises located in Bristol, Connecticut, where it was engaged in the manufacture of automobile parts and accessories. As part of its business, GMC received and shipped various parts and supplies from its premises in Bristol. The third-party defendant, the Boyle Equipment Company (hereinafter referred to as Boyle), was engaged in the business of selling and installing dock shelters. The purpose of a dock shelter is to provide shelter over a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Levine v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Jacksonville Terminal Company v. Railway Express Agency, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jemco, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Burkle v. Car & Truck Leasing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Cirrito v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Pegasus Management Co., Inc. v. Lyssa, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Laura McClelland v. Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education in His Official Capacity; And Weatherford Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025