Legal Opinion

Civil Ag Group, Inc. v. Octaform Systems, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 1, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-2318 (WMW/SER)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO THE DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS

Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Octaform Systems, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Civil Ag Group, Inc.’s complaint pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. (Dkt. 6.) Because the forum-selection clause contained in the terms and conditions of Octaform’s sales orders does not apply to the present dispute and Octaform offers no other grounds for its motion, the Court denies Octaform’s motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

This case involves…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fairview Health Services v. Quest Software Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API