Legal Opinion

Kleinhans v. Whiting

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. - Action by Frederick Kleinhans against Charles L. Whiting and others for damages suffered from a defective steam-boat boiler manufactured for him by defendants, and which they agreed should be satisfactory in every respect, and should pass the government inspector’s test. The boiler was manufactured and delivered in Erie county.

Read the full summary

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. - Action by Frederick Kleinhans against Charles L. Whiting and others for damages suffered from a defective steam-boat boiler manufactured for him by defendants, and which they agreed should be satisfactory in every respect, and should pass the government inspector’s test. The boiler was manufactured and delivered in Erie county. The plaintiff resides in Monroe county, and his steam-boat runs from Charlotte to a summer resort known as “Long Pond,” both in Monroe county. The government inspector’s test, also, was made in Monroe county, and the boiler…

1Per curiam

Order appealed from reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, for the reason that all the matters in issue arose in Monroe county.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gilbert v. Shortsville Cart Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API