Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. Cayse
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 2010No. CA 10-680PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EZELL, JUDGE.
| Daniel Cayse appeals a judgment of the trial court ruling that Donald Maxwell was not liable for the costs of removing and replacing cabinets Mr. Maxwell partially installed in Mr. Cayse’s home. For the following reasons, we hereby affirm the decision of the trial court.
Mr. Cayse and his longtime girlfriend, Tina Foster, began construction of a home in early 2008. Mr. Maxwell was hired to construct cabinets for the home. A price of $8,800 was agreed upon, with $4,400 advanced at the time of the agreement.1 As the fabrication of the cabinets progressed, an additional $2,000 was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Canovsky v. GehrsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Mount Mariah Baptist Church, Inc. v. Pannell's Associated Electric, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Factor King, LLC v. Block Builders, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2016
- Calvin Paul Williams v. Vincent AlexanderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Direct Tech Drilling, LLC v. Danrik Construction, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Hester v. Burns BuildersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hester v. Burns BuildersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.