Legal Opinion

Diulus v. Churchill Valley Country Club

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, District Judge.

The Complaint in this case was filed by Plaintiffs alleging that their constitutional rights were violated by Defendants’ conduct in ongoing state court litigation. The Defendants in this action are Churchill Valley Country Club, its officers and directors (hereinafter “Churchill”). Plaintiffs allege claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 1985. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiffs responded with a Motion to Amend the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Since we find the amended complaint fails to state a cause of action, we will deny…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lindes v. SutterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  2. Krouse v. American Sterilizer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Thompson v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API