People v. Loughlin

Weinstein, J.,

concurs insofar as defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree is affirmed but otherwise dissents and votes to affirm his conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, with a memorandum: Consistent with my dissent in People v Love (100 AD2d 975, mot for lv to app den 62 NY2d 808), I cannot adhere to the majority’s conclusion that the proof is insufficient, as a matter of law, to sustain defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. As in that case, there was in…