Abney v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1ConcurrencePieper, J.
I concur with the majority opinion that the evidence supports the PCR court’s determination Abney did not prove trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to request a jury instruction on the lesser included offense of strong arm robbery. I write separately to further discuss the decision-making authority between a criminal defendant and his lawyer.
*48Certain decisions are considered fundamental and personal to a criminal defendant, and thus, are waivable only by the defendant. United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525, 1531 (11th Cir.1992). For example, a defendant has the ultimate…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. Donald TeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Michael Earl Sexton v. James B. French, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- People v. BrocksmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.