Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Abney v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 19, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2010-164906; No. 5207Published

1ConcurrencePieper, J.

I concur with the majority opinion that the evidence supports the PCR court’s determination Abney did not prove trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to request a jury instruction on the lesser included offense of strong arm robbery. I write separately to further discuss the decision-making authority between a criminal defendant and his lawyer.

*48Certain decisions are considered fundamental and personal to a criminal defendant, and thus, are waivable only by the defendant. United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525, 1531 (11th Cir.1992). For example, a defendant has the ultimate…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. GrierWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. United States v. Donald TeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Michael Earl Sexton v. James B. French, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. People v. BrocksmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API