Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Jenks

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 23, 1946No. File No. 16330Published

1Opinion of the CourtQuinlan, J.

This action is in court. Assuming that a temporary injunction in a given case were issued ex parte, it cannot be said that a motion to dissolve may not be treated as a demurrer. A demurrer has been filed to the application for such an injunction. That the granting of a temporary injunction lies in the sound discretion of the court is so fundamental .as not to require supporting citation. In this state there is no appeal from the issuance of a temporary injunction. As was said by this court (Inglis, J.), “if a temporary injunction is once issued there is no stay possible and the defendant may *84b…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dodd v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  2. Waterbury Savings Bank v. LawlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  3. City of New London v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. Seeley v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  5. Wilcox v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API