Legal Opinion

Seagen Inc v. Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 1, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01613Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 SEAGEN INC., CASE NO. C22-1613JLR 11 Petitioner, ORDER v. 12 DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., 13 Respondent. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court are (1) Petitioner Seagen Inc.’s (“Seagen”) petition to vacate an 17 August 11, 2022 interim arbitration award and a November 17, 2023 final arbitration 18 award (together, the “Award”) (Petition (Dkt. # 78); Pet. Mem. (Dkt. ## 81 (sealed), 115 19 (redacted)); Pet. Reply (Dkt. ## 116 (sealed), 118 (redacted)); see 12/1/23 Chivvis Decl. 20 (Dkt. # 82) ¶ 2, Ex.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Subhash C. MALHOTRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COTTER & COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,929 Theodore B. Wessel v. L. M. Buhler and N. A. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API