Legal Opinion
Matter of All Products Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 29, 1983No. 19-41280PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEORGE BRODY, Bankruptcy Judge.
The question presented is whether a parent corporation who files a consolidated return for an affiliated group and obtains a tax saving from the use of a subsidiary’s operating loss must compensate the subsidiary for the use of that loss.
Darfield Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, functioned as a holding company managing the operations of and providing services to two of its operating subsidiaries, Sun Valley Products, Inc., and All Products Company (All Products). Darfield performed certain administrative services on behalf of its two…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In the Matter of Mobile Steel Company, Debtor. Elaine E. Benjamin v. Lester Y. Diamond, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Mobile Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Western Pacific Railroad Corp. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Comstock v. Group of Institutional InvestorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Prudential Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Bergquist v. Anderson-Greenwood Aviation Corp. (In Re Bellanca Aircraft Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- In Re OsborneDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1984
- Nisselson v. Drew Industries, Inc. (In Re White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Matter of ColinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.