Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The portion of the order from which the plaintiff appeals is not embodied in a decretal paragraph and does not otherwise grant or deny relief. Instead, that portion of the order is a conclusion of law which is not independently appealable (see Higgins v Higgins, 50 AD3d 852, 852 [2008]; Cosh v Cosh, 45 AD3d 798, 799 [2007]; Griggs v Griggs, 44 AD3d 710, 711 [2007]; ELRAC, Inc. v Belessis, 303 AD2d 445, 446 [2003]; Napolitano v Kaddoch, 275 AD2d 445 [2000]; Naar v Litwak & Co., 260 AD2d 613, 614 [1999]; Clark v Weiner, 254 AD2d 322 [1998]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Rivera,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griggs v. GriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Higgins v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cosh v. CoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Naar v. I.J. Litwak & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Clark v. WeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Glassman v. ProHealth Ambulatory Surgery Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Glassman v. ProHealth Ambulatory Surgery Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Golban v. ZalmanovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- In re Riven FlamebaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Riven FlamebaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012