Legal Opinion

Healy v. Seward

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1892No. 605PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clarke Cov/nty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

This was an equitable action, and the respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon a number of *320grounds, none of which we find to be sufficient. We shall notice but one or two of them. The court below found in favor of the appellant as to the undivided one-eighth of the land in controversy, and against him as to the other seven-eighths. The appeal was taken only from that part of the judgment which w’as against the appellant, and the respondent finds fault with his so doing. This is exactly what the law contemplates a party may and should do in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. HollandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bash v. Culver Gold Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pratsch v. Aberdeen Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API