Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. McConaughey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1903No. 9,994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to tbe district court for Hamilton county: Edward Bates, District Judge. Rehearing of case reported in 63 Neb. 10.

1Opinion of the Court

Kirkpatrick, C.

This is a replevin action tried in the district court for Hamilton county. An opinion was filed in the case on November 20, 1901. Ulrich v. McConaughey, 63 Neb. 10.

The questions involved in the controversy are stated at length in the former opinion, and, therefore, need not be restated herein. We have made a careful examination of the entire record, and are of the opinion that the conclusion reached at the former hearing in this court is correct, as announced in paragraphs numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the syllabus. So much of the opinion, therefore, as relates to these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Billings, Boise & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Barber v. CrowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ulrich v. McConaugheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Catron v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis County v. Purdue PharmaUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Clark v. OldhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Clark v. OldhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API