Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hernandez

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 29, 1994No. A-4380Published

1DissentCoats, Judge

In our system of justice, sentencing is primarily a trial court function. Nicholas v. State, 477 P.2d 447, 448-49 (Alaska 1970). A trial court judge is in a much better position to evaluate the defendant and the evidence. An appeals court, relying on a printed transcript and written briefs, is in a poor position to evaluate the offender and the offense. Appellate review of sentencing must therefore give trial courts broad deference in these areas.

Judge Weeks, who has had extensive experience as a prosecuting attorney, heard the evidence in two trials in this case. On the *1318record, it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  3. State v. KarnosCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. State v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API