Legal Opinion

Draude & Donnelly, Inc. v. Alfred Wolstenholme & Son, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1926No. Appeal 172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

This is an action of trespass to recover for damages to the truck of plaintiff, resulting from a collision with a truck of the defendant, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the driver of the latter truck. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals.

The first assignment of error is to the refusal of the court to give binding instructions in favor of the defendant and the second alleges that the court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor non obstante veredicto. It is the contention of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mastel v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Snyder v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Penrose v. Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Gower v. Harakal Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. DuBois Lumber & Coal Co. v. StrouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API