Hull v. Davidson

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

Suit brought February 20, 1890, with a writ of sequestration, to recover a certain sorrel mare or her value. Judgment in the County Court for $135, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

Among the defenses relied upon by the defendant Hull was the plea of two years limitation. To this the plaintiff replied, “that the animal in controversy was stolen from the plaintiff herein in the fall of 1887.” It appears from the plaintiff’s testimony, assuming the identity of the animal sued for with that claimed by the defendant, that she was missed from her range in Young County…