Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Burkett v. Burkett

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 24, 2011No. 2090587Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Judge

I concur with the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s judgment to the extent that it awarded primary physical custody of the children to the wife and divided the parties’ property. I respectfully dissent, however, as to the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s judgment to the extent that it requires the husband to “maintain life insurance insuring his life and providing death benefits in an amount not less than $500,000.00 with the parties’ minor children being designated as the primary beneficiaries, for so long as child support is payable hereunder.”

“Generally, whether to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gazipura v. GazipuraCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API