Legal Opinion
In Re Presentment of Essex Cty. Grand Jury
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 7, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
46 N.J. 467 (1966)
217 A.2d 874
IN RE PRESENTMENT OF THE ESSEX COUNTY GRAND JURY.
HARRY ROSEN, MOVANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued December 7, 1965.
Decided March 7, 1966.
Mr. Matthew P. Boylan argued the cause for movant-appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Crummy, Gibbons & O'Neill, attorneys; Mr. Boylan, of counsel).
Mr. Brendan T. Byrne, Essex County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Mr. Byrne, attorney; Mr. Robert F.X. O'Keefe, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Camden County Grand JurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- In Re Presentment by Camden Co. Grand JurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Rosen v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PorroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- In Re Essex County Grand JuryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- In Re Presentment of Camden Cty. Grand JuryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.