Legal Opinion
(PC) Beeson v. Warden
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 22, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01621Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAYLOR A. BEESON, No. 2:23-cv-1621 DJC CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN, F.C.I. HERLONG, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 20, 2024, plaintiff filed a document which the court construes, in part, as a 18 request that the undersigned recuse. 19 I. Legal Standard: 20 Federal law allows a judge to recuse from a matter based on a question of partiality: 21 Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. $292,888.04 in U.S. Currency, Calvin L. Robinson, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Raisa R. Mayes v. David A. Leipziger and Levy, Leipziger & NormintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.