Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1982No. 43433PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Movant, Eugene Smith, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

We affirm.

Movant pleaded guilty to three counts of unlawful sale of Phenmetrazine, a Schedule II controlled substance. He was sentenced to seven years imprisonment on each count, terms to be served concurrently. Probation was granted but subsequently revoked.

Movant raises five points on appeal. In his first point movant claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not inform movant that he could request a separate trial on each count of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HurttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. BufordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. In Interest of ADRSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Shepherd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ChildersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Cowans v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Willen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bishop v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. McNealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API