Patorno v. Schillaci
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BOUTALL, Judge.
Plaintiff, Ursula Patorno Schillaci, appeals a judgment that maintained the defendant-husband’s exception of no cause of action as to plaintiff’s claim for permanent alimony after divorce based upon two years separation.
Plaintiff filed suit for divorce based upon two years separation in January, 1975, praying that she be found free from fault as to entitle her to alimony, per L.C.C. 160. The defendant filed an exception of no cause of action regarding the issue of alimony after divorce, directing the court’s attention to the fact that the plaintiff had previously been found at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nethken v. NethkenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Fulmer v. FulmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Lloveras v. ReichertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Schillaci v. SchillaciLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morgan v. ValleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ebey v. EbeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981