Legal Opinion

Patorno v. Schillaci

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1976No. 7680PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUTALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, Ursula Patorno Schillaci, appeals a judgment that maintained the defendant-husband’s exception of no cause of action as to plaintiff’s claim for permanent alimony after divorce based upon two years separation.

Plaintiff filed suit for divorce based upon two years separation in January, 1975, praying that she be found free from fault as to entitle her to alimony, per L.C.C. 160. The defendant filed an exception of no cause of action regarding the issue of alimony after divorce, directing the court’s attention to the fact that the plaintiff had previously been found at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nethken v. NethkenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Fulmer v. FulmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Lloveras v. ReichertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Schillaci v. SchillaciLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. ValleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Ebey v. EbeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API